6/18/2011

多向度居住概念:The architecture for distributed systems

CAN THE PLANET WITHSTAND ANOTHER 20TH CENTURY?

The architecture of the 21st century will be the first that is part of natural history.

The machineries of consumption and appropriation of the environment and its resources are pushing the global habitat toward collapse from exhaustion. The direct consequence of an age in which economic growth inevitably entailed physical growth.
Architecture and the city are the interface that we have provided ourselves with in order to interact with the world. At the local and the global scale.
Is it possible to define a general theory of multiscalar habitability on which we can live our lives in the decades to come?
We make the world fit for us to inhabit by means of functional nodes linked by networks that structure a once natural environment. A networked world.
Architecture is the functional precipitation of activities in a place. Ordered crystals, condensers of micro worlds. Condensation of knowledge.
If recent history has been constructed on the basis of centralized systems of energy, information or production, the new history will be constructed on the basis of distributed, decentralized systems, by way of operational nodes —people, things, places, territories— that cooperate freely in order to be more efficient.
What is the architecture for distributed systems like?
As in all mutations, the saturation of the city’s vital systems leads to their re-programming on the basis of principles that are closer to those of information systems than the simple accumulation of inorganic matter.
Time and, with it, speed serve to define the rhythm of interaction between people and their environment. A new material in project design.
More ordered information creates a world that is more specific, not more generic.
A world capable of accumulating history inside itself. What makes us human beings, not bacteria, is that our cells have managed to conserve information about their history through each mutation.
To construct anywhere on the planet is to submit the site to structural changes, which should be the product of the emerging relationships with the place, like a geological process of saturation or erosion.
More connected information generates more nature.
The re-programming of the world occurs when a fine informational rain is capable of drenching every element on the planet, endowing it with a digital identity, enabling it to interact with other elements by means of decentralized relational protocols.
In this way we create living organisms, never again inert, that react to specific geographies and mutate, where appropriate, in response to external influences.
Rather than being a client node in a network, then, architecture is an entity that tends toward the connected self-sufficiency characteristic of natural systems.
Buildings as trees. Cities as forests.
Are architects, architects of information architecture?
The citizens, instead of being the consumers of information, are its creators.
The citizens, instead of being the consumers of architecture, can be its constructors.
Is architecture an iconic or a systemic activity?
Finally, every object we design and construct on the planet forms part of a functional network that connects the different scales of habitability.
1, 10, 100, 1,000, 10,000, 100,000, 1,000,000, 10,000,000, 100,000,000, 1,000,000,000, 10,000,000,000 people organize themselves by programming their relationship with the other scales by way of relational systems whose structure defines the cultural values of each society. From a book to the Library of Congress; from a lamp to a nuclear power station; from a crucifix to the Vatican.
Any object, any building is ultimately the physical representation of an information node.
The construction of a dwelling, a block or a city is part of the same project of multiscalar habitability.
To change the history of the world is to change the history of the scalar relations between the functional networks of habitability.
Architecture can remain in the realm of fashion, as an activity that acts on the surface of things, or it can lead this structural transformation through which we can help to write a new history of the world.
Vicente Guallart. Jul 2008
http://www.hyperhabitat.net/blog/?page_id=71

4/06/2011

施老師的回信 -- RE: 空間詩學

宛吟

你說的沒錯,那本書引述了這個領域相關文獻,並進行分類。不過我沒辦法從這些引述和分類中得到更深層的體會,所以書中的資料也就還是資料,沒辦法成為知識。倒是段義孚的那本書,我覺得或許可以從中獲得一些啟示。

教育部的計畫我這幾天一直猶豫要不要提,今天早上突然有所領悟,這是一個機會,可以把我們這一陣子在想的事情整合起來。我先把一些零碎的概念寫下:

Heidelberg談dwelling的四合一元素,天、地、人、神,可以做為先前我們談的人與環境,人與人,與過去及未來的溝通這個看法的哲學基礎。神的概念比較抽象,不過基本上代表人對未知世界(從何處來,往何處去?也就是人的過去與未來)的回應,就是歸諸於神。科學把很多未知變為已知,可是其實也讓我們知道更多未知之事。對於divinity的追求,其實是源自於人的本性,並不因科學的進展而消弭。天和地象徵人和環境透過溝通(資訊交換)而成為和諧的整體。再來就是人和人的關係。

這個計畫的一個重點選項就是「永續智慧生活空間」,原先我不想以此為方向,因為恐怕有很多評審將此解釋為環境控制與節能。這好比服裝設計師以保暖與節省布料車工為設計目標一樣偏狹。這是一個領域整合的計畫,我想帶向從資訊觀點看人與自然的關係。建築只是人與自然很多層次的界面之一,而最根本的需求就是生存。人在自然環境中必須透過很多層次的界面才能夠生存,從皮膚開始,到衣服,房間,住家,建築,社區,都市,區域甚至大氣層,太陽系,銀河環環相扣,缺了任何一環人類就無法生存。從人與人溝通的觀點來看,沒有人可以獨立於他人而存在,必須透過層層的社交關係,從個人,家庭,家族,到社群,乃至於社會、國家。

生存好像是一個最低層次的目標,維持生存所需似乎是生活空間必須滿足的最低條件,低到讓人不屑一顧。生活空間有太多高層次的目標要去追求,不過這些高層次的目標其實都是基於生存的基本需求而衍伸出來的。生存包含兩件基本的事,就是活著和生殖。我認為所有空間認知的本能都是基於這兩個要件而演化出來的。一個人選擇空間中的處境,一方面是選擇舒適的物理環境,另一方面就是選擇適合的資訊情境。

這個部分先暫停,回到課程的事。這個課程地圖談的是從資訊的觀點看人與環境的關係。隔了一個下午,現在似乎沒有早上的靈感了,下次再說。

施宣光

senses of space

感 覺 空 間

感覺是人與生俱來的能力
而每一種感覺都可以劃分出不同的空間
在沒有光害的夜晚 我看得到距離幾光年的星星
行走在街道上 我聞的到咫尺之外咖啡館傳來的咖啡香
在美術館旁的公園 我也聽的到兩三哩外飛機飛過的聲音
在寒冷的冬天 我感受的到迎面而來陣陣的寒風 和身旁溫暖的手

這些都是感覺所營造出的空間

Edward T. Hall 將感覺空間分為五大類:
1. 視覺空間
2. 聽覺空間
3. 嗅覺空間
4. 熱覺空間
5. 觸覺空間

其中 人們偏好使用視覺和聽覺來作為再現系統
容易忽略嗅覺 熱覺 觸覺或味覺(或許這是最深藏體內的感覺空間)

這些是我們用來表示人際關係距離的基礎
幾乎所有兩人以上的溝通情境, 都會運用到這五種感覺空間, 不過有時候其中一種或幾種感覺空間,對於人際關係的界定特別重要.

Interaction order

John Seely Brown 與加州柏克萊大學教授Paul Duguid 曾說...我們熱衷於世界上大量增加的資訊, 卻忽略了 “資訊與個人必然是豐富的社會網路一份子” 唯有將資訊紮根在社會和實體的世界中, 資訊才會成為知識.

資訊的傳遞 需要共通的“語言”
可以是說話 動作 眼神 表情, 視覺符號(圖像/象徵/指示)亦或是地方符號 (所有非語言象徵 可值接或間接再現語言)
我們透過各種互動秩序 與周遭世界的符號系統互動

互動累積情感 才有意義

關於人類行動與地點的時空相關性 瑞典地理學家哈格斯傳 (Torsten Hagerstrand)首先提出了八項原則 :
1. 人類的不可分割性
2. 每個人的生命長度有限
3. 人類同時參與一件以上的事情之能力有限
4. 每件任務(或活動) 都有期間
5. 在空間的兩點之間移動需要時間
6. 空間的容納有限
7. 任何陸地空間外在大小有限
8. 任何情境, 無可避免地源自於過去其他情境

生活要求個體不斷地讓自己與周遭環境所浮現的實體連結
這些要素有些是我們本身主動尋找的 有些則是無可避免的

當空間超連結介入在個人 物體 時間與空間裡
或許這個世界將從此改變


空間關係學 Theory of proxemics
Edward T. Hall is most associated with proxemics, the study of the human use of space within the context of culture.
In The Hidden Dimension (1966), Hall developed his theory of proxemics, arguing that human perceptions of space, although derived from sensory apparatus that all humans share, are molded and patterned by culture. He argued that differing cultural frameworks for defining and organizing space, which are internalized in all people at an unconscious level, can lead to serious failures of communication and understanding in cross-cultural settings.

His most famous innovation: the definition of the informal, or personal spaces that surround individuals:
  • Intimate space—the closest "bubble" of space surrounding a person. Entry into this space is acceptable only for the closest friends and intimates.
  • Social and consultative spaces—the spaces in which people feel comfortable conducting routine social interactions with acquaintances as well as strangers.
  • Public space—the area of space beyond which people will perceive
    interactions as impersonal and relatively anonymous.
其最為人之的"人際距離“ 概念:
1. 親密距離 (接觸到18吋/ 0~45 cm)
2. 個人距離 (18吋到四呎/ 45~1.2 m)
3. 社會距離 (四呎到十二呎/ 1.2~ 3.7 m)
4. 公共距離 ( 十二呎到二十五呎/ 3.7~7.5 m)

4/05/2011

Spatial hyperlink

City of Bits
Space, Place, and the Infobahn
William J. Mitchell
http://mitpress.mit.edu/e%2Dbooks/City%5Fof%5FBits/

建築即界面
architecture is interface

在網路的世界 不須特定的場所 卻隨時都可以被搜尋到
我們並非進入網路空間 而是從各地連上網路
網路 將互動關係 “非空間化” 了 (despatialization)

如果
反過來 網路空間就是我們所生活的空間

Considering if Spatial hyperlink can be a way to connect human, time, space and the environment,  what it will be like when "hyperlink" existed in this world across space and time?


Spatial hyperlink could not only reconfigure our relations with ourselves and with one another, but most importantly,it reshapes our sense of identity, belonging, and place.


跨越時空 空間超連結將人 事 物 與存在其中的記憶串聯

4/03/2011

Tomorrow is another day

還記得 Gone with the wind結束前,郝思嘉面對殘破大院說了這句語重心長的話:
After all, tomorrow is another day.
是啊! 這就是人生...
我們給了自己很大的期許 為了夢想 努力向前衝
雖然 這次我們又再次被擋在會場入口前...
滿分但是落選
很失落 真的...
自我安慰的話 多說無益
活在當下 繼續向前進才是當務之急

還記得昨天修手機時 親切的店員跟我說 "不要怕!!" (這是犀利人妻效應吧)
我不會害怕的!
這個假期 正如我的轉捩點
讓難過隨著風飄逝...
未來 加油!